What comes in
- PO, receipt or invoice exports with a defined basis
- Supplier and item/category mappings
- Currency basis and reporting period
LaunchAI reconciles supplier, item and category records, organizes comparable transactions and puts the evidence behind each opportunity.
The job in one minute
Procurement spend analysis groups purchasing data to show where money goes and where a buyer should investigate. LaunchAI can assemble and classify records across existing reports. The analysis should distinguish ordered, received and invoiced values, and keep opportunity estimates separate from verified savings.
A reconciled spend view and an evidence-linked opportunity list.
The buyer and the responsible team keep commercial, qualification and financial authority. The agent does the permitted work and brings exceptions to their owner.
At the buyer’s desk
Two plants buy the same item under different supplier names. One invoice includes freight; another lists it separately. The spreadsheet shows a price difference, but the buyer still has to establish whether the purchases are comparable.
Vendor aliases, inconsistent categories and credits can make the same purchase appear in several totals. A price difference may be caused by quantity breaks, freight or specification rather than a negotiating opportunity. Buyers need comparable transactions before they can make a savings claim.
How the agent does it
LaunchAI follows the purchasing task through your existing applications. Each step has a source to read, a rule to apply or an outcome to check.
Define whether the report measures commitments, receipts or invoices and state how credits and tax are treated.
Map vendor aliases, sites and item units. Keep unresolved classifications visible.
Group by supplier, category or site. Compare like specifications and quantities before highlighting price variance.
Link each opportunity to its transactions and assumptions. Track realized results separately from modeled opportunities.
The detail that changes the job
Two plants buy the same item, but one invoice includes freight and the other lists it separately.
Move the divider to see how the starting information becomes a checked outcome. The complete fields are in the table below.
| Field | Starting information | Checked outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier | Two local aliases | One legal supplier with two sites |
| Price basis | Mixed freight treatment | Like-for-like cost basis |
| Savings | Raw price difference | Opportunity requiring validation |
Worked example, not a customer result. Values and documents illustrate what to test.
Exact rules. Context. A person where needed.
The agent needs to recognize the point where the next action depends on missing information or another person’s authority.
Define the allowed fields and actions in your software. A draft, an external commitment and an approved payment are different steps.
Show the working
Agree on the baseline and the finish before the pilot. Count review and exception work as well as completed transactions.
Spend mapped to a known supplier and category
Unreconciled value in the report
Verified savings against an agreed baseline
The practical questions
No. A price variance is a reason to investigate. Savings need an agreed baseline and evidence that the result was achieved.
An existing ERP report and spreadsheet may be sufficient for a first workflow. The demo should validate reconciliation and repeatability before adding scope.
Your applications. Your purchasing rules.
We’ll scope the input, the saved output and the exception that needs your team.