Luis (field)
IMG_5530.jpg: Bldg C mezz stair, legal pad
LaunchAI converts stair and railing sketches and field measures into CAD drawings. Create dimensioned stair models, rail layouts and shop drawings. The drawing is built from the supplied measurements, notes and specifications. Unclear details are flagged for your team to review.
For detailers, project managers and estimators at miscellaneous and structural metals fabricators
Friday the field guy walked the Building C mezzanine with a tape, a laser and a legal pad. You have his sheet: the stair drawn as a lightning bolt, "10' 1 FF-FF" at the top, "7 3/4 rise?" next to it, a box for the landing, and a guard run with posts ticked off at what might be 4' or might be 5'. There's also a GC email with an RFI response that moves the landing, a photo of an embed plate that isn't where S-201 says it is, and a voicemail asking for approval drawings by Wednesday.
So you do the math again. Floor-to-floor divided by risers until it lands under your limit and divides clean. Treads one fewer than risers. Check the run against the wall, check headroom under the beam at the worst tread. Then into Advance Steel or AutoCAD: MC12 stringers, grating treads with abrasive nosing, the landing frame, guard posts, toe plate, rail returns at the wall. Then the approval set. Then the cut list.
None of it is hard. It's the same afternoon for every stair and every rail, and it all waits behind the one person in the building who can do it. Get one floor-to-floor wrong and you find out when the top riser is an inch and a half off and the inspector is standing on it.
What the job looks like today
Floor-to-floor, available run, landing, rail ticks, and which numbers he wasn't sure of.
Risers, treads, headroom, stringer length: by calculator, again.
Stringers, treads, landing frame, posts and rails, built by hand in your detailing software.
Plans, elevations, sections and notes for the GC.
Then fix the landing the RFI moved, and issue it again.
Where it goes wrong
Nothing on these sheets looks wrong. It looks wrong when the stair is hanging off the crane and doesn't reach.
He measured slab to slab, before the 2" topping on one level and the tile on the other. Now the top and bottom risers don't match the rest, which is the first thing every inspector checks.
"7 3/4 max" is the residential number. A commercial egress stair is 7" max, and an OSHA industrial stair allows more. The field guy wrote the one he remembers, not the one this job is built to.
Six ticks on a 22' guard run. Is that 4'-4" on center, or 5' with the end posts not drawn? It changes the post count, the base plates and the embed layout the GC is pouring next week.
The landing frame bolts to embeds the GC poured three inches low. The structural drawing says one thing, the photo says another, and your shop drawing has to show what's actually there.
Why it's still manual
Misc metals shops have AutoCAD, Advance Steel or Tekla, and a stair calculator on somebody's phone. The field sheet still has to be read and turned into a stair by a person.
Your CAD and quoting software
Waits for someone to type
Advance Steel, Tekla and SDS2 have stair and rail macros that build a stair in minutes, once someone types in the floor-to-floor, the run, the riser count, the stringer and the landing. The legal pad doesn't type itself in.
Generic AI and OCR models
Confidently wrong
A generic model reads "10' 1" as 10.1, "7 3/4" as 73/4, and fills the missing landing depth with something reasonable. Then it does the division with total confidence. Stair math on a misread number is a stair that doesn't fit.
Image-to-CAD converters
Traces lines, not intent
Image-to-CAD converters trace the zigzag on the pad. The sketch isn't to scale and he drew as many treads as he had room for. The numbers are the stair, and converters skip the numbers.
Measuring apps and configurators
Only if everyone uses them
Laser measures, stair calculators and photo-measuring apps are good at taking the number. They don't pick the riser count against this job's code basis, check headroom under the beam, or build the stringers in Advance Steel.
How the agent does it
LaunchAI converts the sketch and its measurements into CAD geometry, applies your drawing standards and prepares the related order information. Missing dimensions and unclear notes are flagged for your team to review.
Heights, runs, landings, embeds and rail notes, with a confidence score on each value.
Riser count, treads and headroom against the job's code basis and your shop rules.
Opens Advance Steel or AutoCAD and builds it the way your detailer would.
Approval drawings, cut lengths and material list, with the latest RFI applied.
Your detailer confirms the flagged value and issues for approval.
Caught at the desk
Today the order bounces when someone hits save. The agent runs the same checks first, fills what it can from a trusted source, and brings you only the one thing that needs a person.
Today
Shop drawing cannot be issued for approval
Verify the following
With the agent
Floor-to-floor divides clean
121" ÷ 16 risers = 7-9/16" exactly. No odd riser at the top or bottom.
Riser note disagrees
Field wrote "7 3/4 rise?" (15.6 risers). Drawn 16 R @ 7-9/16"; confirm before issuing.
Inside the code basis
Job set to OSHA 1910.25 industrial stair: riser and 11" tread inside your limits.
Run fits the opening
15 treads @ 11" = 13' 9", matching the available run on the field sheet.
Headroom
80" minimum clear under the beam along the full flight.
Landing per latest RFI
RFI 041 overrides the field sheet: landing moved 6" north.
Human review
The paperwork on one side, the agent's drawing on the other, and every value it read in between, with the one it's unsure of called out.
Approval you asked for
The agent computed the stair from the field sheet and drew stringers, treads, landing and guard. The field riser note disagrees with the math.
Agent suggests: Approve 16 risers at 7-9/16". The field note "7 3/4 rise?" works out to 15.6 risers and doesn't divide 121" evenly.
Dimensions read from sketch
Inputs and outputs
Your numbers
Change the numbers to match your shop.
Example values. Put in your own.
today with the agent: review only
Your software
LaunchAI converts sketches into drawings through your CAD and design workflow. Bring your software version, drawing standards and a sample sketch so we can confirm the conversion steps and outputs for your setup.
FAQ
Yes. LaunchAI agents use your software through the screen with your team's logins, the same way your detailer does. It can drive the stair and rail macros in Advance Steel or Tekla, or draw it in AutoCAD with your blocks and layers. No plug-in, no API.
The agent never invents a dimension. A missing landing depth or an unclear floor-to-floor basis gets flagged and turned into a drafted question back to the field or the GC, and the stair waits for the answer instead of being guessed.
It checks the rules you set per job: IBC, IRC or OSHA basis, max riser, min tread, headroom, guard and handrail heights, opening limits. Anything outside gets flagged. Your detailer and engineer of record still own code compliance.
Your detailer. The agent stops at a review screen with the model, the math and every flagged value. Nothing is issued for approval, released to the shop or sent to the GC until someone on your team signs off.
Yes. Guard and handrail runs, post spacing, terminations, wall returns, fixed ladders with cages, and ship's ladders all come off field sheets the same way.
For first drafts of field-measured stairs and rails, it can take a big share of the backlog. Most shops keep their outside detailer for the monumental stair and let the agent handle the repetitive packages.
Other industries
Send us a stack of last month's field sheets.